Critical Thinking of Lecture 2: Class And Inequalities: Between Smith and Marx. Done By Tay Mingrui

August 20, 2008 by rui82

According to Adam Smith, he believes in gaining the greatest goods for the greatest number. He thinks that people should be allowed to freely pursue their own personal gain (selfish gains at times) with little restraints as possible.

I have no doubts that it is good for economical purpose as people will be extremely motivated to find a way to maximize own profits and thinking out of the box without any restriction to accumulate more wealth. But I believe that the greed of the people has made them exploit the system and nobody wants to share their wealth. It is like an endless pursuit to their desire of wealth and power.

Being in a competitive environment is good as people will push to their limits to increase productivity to try to eliminate fellow competitors.

Technological advances have caused some workers to be replaced by machines and this leads to a growing unemployment rate. Companies that have superior wealth and power can get these new technologies and thus reducing the need for workers. And they have the edge (cost saving over lesser workers needed for production in the long run and better productivity) over fellow competitors that will probably get booted out of the competition if they do not have the capital to follow suit.

The rich countries have the knowledge, network, political and military power. They exploited the ignorance and small network of the poor countries, by paying them poorly for their raw material and selling the finished goods at high prices. There are no fair trades at all as the rich abuses their superiority to trample all over the poor and hence the “poor” nations were made poor.

 

Karl Marx believes that the effective challenge would be revolution whereby it overturns the capitalist system to a system of common ownership for the common good, a system of pure communism. There will be a minimum wages for all workers, reduced working hours, banned child labor and improve the conditions and protections of workers everywhere.

I feel there will be a lack of motivation for the workers if there is a minimum wages for all workers. As workers might have this mentality that “Why should I work so hard since the minimum pay is the same for all workers?” This lack of competitive environment leads to lower productivity which in turns affects the economical benefit of the nation.

I think there will be lesser stress for people in communist society as they are less likely to be out of job and they get better or fair treatments.

I think government intervention is very important as they can try to reduce the gap between the rich and the poor within the nation. Having a capitalist economic structure to ensure economic growth and an active government to aid the disadvantaged population is a hybrid that I think it will work well for all different classes in the society. But I think more can be done if heavy taxes are imposed on those top earners who accumulated multi millions of net worth, have the cash to distribute to the poorer people.

 

Personal Opinion: Sometimes I wonder why do some individual want to accumulate so much wealth and do not want to share it with the poor/needy.  Why not give back to the society? Our personal gain is probably someone’s loss.

Critical Thinking Of Lecture1 – Globalization And Social Problems Done By Tay Mingrui

August 14, 2008 by rui82

 

The process of today’s globalization is going faster as compared to ancient globalization because of the technological advances and people are getting more information easily due to internet. Technological advances help us in many ways, for example: It improves our economy, productivity and made our life easier. We could easily get information of what we want easily on the internet and it brings in a new form of communication via internet (emails, online messengers). We could meet our friends in other country real time (online with webcam) and find out how they are doing.

 

Online Gaming is 1 of the favorite pastime for a lot of people right now. Massively Multi-player online role playing games like World Of Warcraft, DOTA, Diablo3 (coming soon) keep people interested because of the foreign social groups that they could get into and play with people from other countries. We can be playing games with the Dutch, German, Americans, and Portuguese etc and generally the population of these games is high.

 

On 12th August 2008, in the home.youth online section of the Straits Times, it wrote that a Straits Times poll shows that online gaming has become massively popular among Singapore youth. Mdm Merlyn Tan said “PC locked up to stop son playing all day”. While this 16years old girl, Siti Aishah said “I must, I must complete my quest”. So what is the problem with Singapore youth gamers these day? Social psychologist of NIE said “It used to be that teens would have to play soccer to fill one need and watch television to fill another. Online games let them do both.” What she meant was they were able to multitask in a different world.

 

In Apirl, research company Synovate released its yearly Asian youth survey, which ranked Singapore’s teen third for time spent playing online games. Online games also reward players for their persistence, which is why many hate it when parents stop them. Some people begin caring more about their online friends that their real life ones, for example: a friend cancelled a movie date at the last minute to game. More than 50 per cent of teens polled admitted that they skipped homework to game. Others passed up outings, even ditched school. A further 30 per cent sacrificed meals. It is not only the online games that parents have to worry about, parents have to watch out of their child’s technological gadgets (PSP etc) on outings, and make them participate more in family bonding and other social activities.

 

The reason I point out this issue is because childhood socialization is important for the growth of the kids. The emergence of technological advances (More gaming gadgets for kids etc) and the ease of getting the gadgets (Too much global competition causes the prices of the gadget to become more and more affordable) will cause parents some serious headaches. What the parents did during their youth time, playing police and thief with other kids, running around playing other social games are no longer applicable to their child these days. It affects how parents would like to bring up their child and making their social lives link to their career.

 

I think today’s globalization will create new social problems that was never encountered many years ago and In this course, we learn how Globalization creates social problems and I hope to learn more on how to apply it to our current society.

 

 

 

Hello world!

August 9, 2008 by rui82

Welcome to WordPress.com. This is your first post. Edit or delete it and start blogging!